Corante

Authors

Clay Shirky
( Archive | Home )

Liz Lawley
( Archive | Home )

Ross Mayfield
( Archive | Home )

Sébastien Paquet
( Archive | Home )

David Weinberger
( Archive | Home )

danah boyd
( Archive | Home )

Guest Authors
Site Search
Monthly Archives
Syndication
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline

Many-to-Many

« All together now: Communication is not "content" | Main | Add Your Own »

September 26, 2003

LiveJournal Obsession Test

Email This Entry

Posted by Clay Shirky

LiveJournal continues to fascinate. TheFerrett has posted a quiz for LJ users, about their LJ use. The quiz is LJ in a microcosm -- sprawling, juvenile, and deeply, effortlessly, and utterly self-absorbed. The categories of LJ behavior covered are Community, Memesheep (LJ has turned morphed 'meme' from description to label, using it for "Talk Like A Pirate"-ish trends), Original Content, Psychodrama, and Attention Whoring. Two things jump out. First, because LJ fuses blog, BBS, and Friendster patterns (and did long before Friendster launched), it is a test range for explosive social issues, like the fact that friending has become a transitive verb _and_ a binary operation, the fact that your social standing is based in part on a numeric friend count, or the odd relationship between truth and ficiton in self-reporting services. Some of my favorite quiz questions, for what they reveal about LJ, are:
Have you ever...

- Talked with your real life friends about your LJ friends as if they should know them?  
- Friended someone based on their LiveJournal icon? 
- Felt guilty for not friending someone back? 
- Made a LiveJournal account for a fictional character
...and had other people believe that it was someone real? 
...and then killed off your fictional character just to get a reaction, and succeeded? (Yes, this has happened.) 
- Created a new journal just to hide from someone? 

- Broken up with someone you were dating and unfriended them? 
...and lost an entire cadre of other friends in the process? 

- Left someone on your friends list only because it would create too much trouble to take them off? 
...and created a filter you used by default so you wouldn't have to read them?  

- Utilized a script or other program to tell you who's friended and unfriended you? 

- Plotted out how you were going to write a LiveJournal post about a particular activity as you were attending that activity? ("Okay, so Suzie just fell in the Jell-O - that's my opening lead-in...") 

- Approached your LJ entries as if they were professional writings - complete with proper spelling, good organization, and attention to grammar? [Telling - ed.]
  
- Requested feedback from your readers about whether you should change an aspect of your personal appearance? ("Should I cut my hair?") 
...and then posted before-and-after pictures when you did it? 

- Fought with a friend over who was going to write up a funny incident? 
Meanwhile, most of the items listed on the quiz, unlike the ones copied here, are common to mailing lists, usenet, BBSes, etc. Nevertheless, things like topic drift, privacy spills, and falling in love or bed with someone you first meet online are presented as if they are unique to LJ. As with believing that your particular high school crowd was unique in some important fashion, it may be necessary for a community to think that such effects mark them as special somehow. I certainly felt that way on usenet in the early 90's. There's also some writeups of the results on TheFerrett's journal.

Comments (1) + TrackBacks (0) | Category:


COMMENTS

1. The Ferrett on January 6, 2004 11:17 PM writes...

Actually, I should add that originally, it was going to be written for all blogs - but LiveJournal had so many features regarding friends that WERE LJ-specific that I had the choice of:

1) Leaving them out and leaving out a lot of the good stuff of LJ;

2) Putting them in and alienating bloggers like yourself who don't have friends lists per se;

3) Programming a section which ignored the LJ section if you weren't an LJ user, which considering nobody pays me jack for these quizzes was asking quite a lot of me.

So yes, I am aware that these weren't LJ-specific, but the reason they were written as if they were was due to shoddy self-editing more than an obliviousness to other cultures. If I had gone ahead and made it "The Ultimate Blogger's Quiz," as I intended, then it would have been a very different story.

Permalink to Comment

TRACKBACKS

TrackBack URL:
http://www.corante.com/cgi-bin/mt/teriore.fcgi/1157.

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference LiveJournal Obsession Test:


EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
Spolsky on Blog Comments: Scale matters
"The internet's output is data, but its product is freedom"
Andrew Keen: Rescuing 'Luddite' from the Luddites
knowledge access as a public good
viewing American class divisions through Facebook and MySpace
Gorman, redux: The Siren Song of the Internet
Mis-understanding Fred Wilson's 'Age and Entrepreneurship' argument
The Future Belongs to Those Who Take The Present For Granted: A return to Fred Wilson's "age question"