« 2004: The Year the Webcam Got Practical |
Main
| The Revenge of Hank, the Angry Drunken Dwarf »
January 3, 2004
Openess creates value, which creates incentive...
Posted by Clay Shirky
There's a fascinating post at WhizSpark noting
a simple way to use referer logs to spam blogdex and other listing and search engines.
I noticed a few days ago, a site on the blogdex index, called picturesplace and visited it. It doesn't have anything special and is a typical porn site with a link to pay to access the paris hilton video, among other content. I was wondering why it was popular on the index and visited the referrer sites. I also found a link to the tracking page for the tracking page of picturesplace.com on blogdex in the popularity index. These two pages on blogdex show links to the pages that link to these two pages. All of these sites had a listing of referrer sites on their blogs...links to sites where their latest visitors came from.
Cameron Marlowe of blogdex
weighs in:
The downside of a completely transparent system is its manipulability, but this is of course also what makes it trustworthy. Sans comment spam (which is largely a product of a weblog software exploit, not Blogdex), there hasn't really been a loophole which has continually affected the index. Blogdex is your sandbox... play around and figure it out. Break it and I'll fix it... then I'll study you and get a Ph.D. ;)
Open systems grow faster than closed ones, and better allow for innovation. This creates value for their users. This value creates incentive for capturing that value, but the incentive is orthagonal to the value -- spammers don't care that their behavior damages the system that created the value to begin with.
I remember the early spam on usenet -- Global Alert for All and the Green Card spam et al. Two things are different now. First, everything that launches launches at scale, at least potentially. It took email more than a decade to get to a million users. Now even moderately interesting software can get a hundred thousand users in months, and million-user software is still "niche", in the sense of sub-1% use compared to the population as a whole.
Second, we've learned the lesson of standards and automation, so we have better hooks into our interfaces, for automatic manipulation, but this means better automation for people gaming the system as well. (I remember, a decade or so ago, someone asking on a newsgroup "How do I post to all the soc. groups at once? soc.* doesn't seem to work -- surely I don't have to enter all the group names in _by hand_!") The arms race is the same, but the speed with which value is created and the ease with which the manipulation can be automated now favor the spammers.
Comments (1)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: social software
- RELATED ENTRIES
- Spolsky on Blog Comments: Scale matters
- "The internet's output is data, but its product is freedom"
- Andrew Keen: Rescuing 'Luddite' from the Luddites
- knowledge access as a public good
- viewing American class divisions through Facebook and MySpace
- Gorman, redux: The Siren Song of the Internet
- Mis-understanding Fred Wilson's 'Age and Entrepreneurship' argument
- The Future Belongs to Those Who Take The Present For Granted: A return to Fred Wilson's "age question"
1. Numit on February 21, 2004 6:47 AM writes...
Yeeeahd, it's csool
Permalink to Comment