Corante

Authors

Clay Shirky
( Archive | Home )

Liz Lawley
( Archive | Home )

Ross Mayfield
( Archive | Home )

Sébastien Paquet
( Archive | Home )

David Weinberger
( Archive | Home )

danah boyd
( Archive | Home )

Guest Authors
Site Search
Monthly Archives
Syndication
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
Just Released the 2008 Tribalization of Business study - an in-depth look at how 140+ organizations are managing and measuring online communities

Many-to-Many

« Finding Mavens in Usenet | Main | Ross and danah in an article on Friendster in the NYT »

January 26, 2005

Britannica not so great on the fact checking department after all

Email This Entry

Posted by Clay Shirky

It’s so good, I don’t even want to comment:

A SCHOOLBOY with a fascination for Poland and wildlife has uncovered several significant errors in the latest — the fifteenth — edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica. Lucian George, 12, a pupil at Highgate Junior School in North London, was delving into the volumes on Poland and wildlife in Central Europe when he noted the mistakes.

More, much more, here.

Comments (4) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: social software


COMMENTS

1. Meme Engineer on January 27, 2005 1:05 AM writes...

The debate over authority versus folk knowledge suggests a hybrid approach in which authorities are corrected by individuals who may possess special knowledge about some topic, but not exhaustive knowledge of that topic. This will work best with authorities who are not afraid to admit the inherent difficulty of knowing anything for certain (e.g., the habitats of lesser-known animals).

Mr. Clay Shirky seems to be going overboard with his evident disdain for authorities; perhaps he has had too many bad experiences with elitism. Certainly, the world is full of crap and people who are full of crap, but that doesn't mean all authorities are full of crap.

Permalink to Comment

2. Zbigniew Lukasiak on January 27, 2005 5:15 AM writes...

The spelling of Puszcza Bialowieska is also wrong - it is transliterated from the Russian form. It is true that the forrest lies currently in both Poland and Bielarus, but when they are talking about the polish part they should use the polish name, I believe.

Permalink to Comment

3. Branko Collin on January 27, 2005 1:38 PM writes...

"Britannica not so great on the fact checking department after all"

Not so great as what? Did you expect greatness? Based on what? How do you define greatness?

Or are you, as I expect, just taking cheap shots? Better leave that to (current and former) Britannica editors.

Permalink to Comment

4. oedipa on January 28, 2005 2:05 PM writes...

Liek the other comments say: fun, but not significant. '12-year old finds factual errors in Wikipedia' wouldn't come anywhere close to being news.

Permalink to Comment

TRACKBACKS

TrackBack URL:
http://www.corante.com/cgi-bin/mt/teriore.fcgi/1827.

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Britannica not so great on the fact checking department after all:


EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
Spolsky on Blog Comments: Scale matters
"The internet's output is data, but its product is freedom"
Andrew Keen: Rescuing 'Luddite' from the Luddites
knowledge access as a public good
viewing American class divisions through Facebook and MySpace
Gorman, redux: The Siren Song of the Internet
Mis-understanding Fred Wilson's 'Age and Entrepreneurship' argument
The Future Belongs to Those Who Take The Present For Granted: A return to Fred Wilson's "age question"