« Emerging Tech Call for Proposals |
Main
| Patient Opinion »
September 6, 2005
web2.0 and glocalization
Posted by danah boyd
I just wrote a rather lengthy essay on glocalization and Web2.0 that discusses the socio-technical aspects of Web2.0. Most M2M readers are interested in social software; this essay is important if you are interested in understanding how social software is being taken to the next level, building a broader paradigm. I argue that the key to Web2.0 is not technology but a process of designing with glocalization in mind.
Because of its length, i have not copied it to M2M.
Comments (8)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: social software
- RELATED ENTRIES
- User-generated neologism: "Indigenous content"
- history of social network sites (a work-in-progress)
- New Freedom Destroys Old Culture: A response to Nick Carr
- responding to critiques of my essay on class
- Tagmashes from LibraryThing
- Spolsky on Blog Comments: Scale matters
- "The internet's output is data, but its product is freedom"
- Andrew Keen: Rescuing 'Luddite' from the Luddites
1. Kris on September 6, 2005 9:24 AM writes...
danah - while I didn't think my response to your request on M2M last week (apophenia round-up: posts that slipped through, below) really answered what you were looking for, your essay actually captures the essence of what I was talking about.
Your view (glocalization) is at a much higher, intellectual level than my particular interest area (groups of people that already know each other in the commercial, civic, or social arena but physically meet only occasionally, if at all), but I agree with you 100% - it's not about the technology; it's about the groups of people who use it.
These groups all have the same 6 common attributes:
1. An audience of diverse needs and interests
2. A purpose or mission and a means to assess the achievement of that mission (nobody does this well)
3. Information and content stored in various forms and media
4. An ever growing array of means to communicate that information (this is the focal point of most current discourse regarding current technology trends)
5. Activity, process, tasks,
6. Some organizational or structural context within which the previous 5 attributes can seamlessly operate for the audience of any particular group.
I believe this last attribute is the most critical missing element and wikis are/will be the answer to that. Give people a seamless way to organize themselves and stay in touch in the context of any particular interest or mission and all the other bells and whistles will fall into place.
Permalink to Comment2. Kris on September 7, 2005 11:27 AM writes...
dissapointing that danah's post received only 1 comment here (mine) and 2 on her own site (2 of the 4 comments there ar her responses to the other 2).
It's a great high-level view and poses some relevant concerns. Does no one have any thoughts, comments, proposals, counter points, agreement...anything?
Permalink to Comment3. Tina on September 8, 2005 6:22 AM writes...
Hello,
I am Tina Nguessan the only surviving daughter of late Dr. Nguessan. I am in the position of some documents covering the deposit of US$25. Million which my late father deposited in one finance Security Company here in this country. I have also verify the transaction and found it to be true.
I am soliciting for your kind assistance in release and claiming of the fund from the company as my father's business associate and have it transfer to you account for investment. You will also serve as the guiding of this fund.
I will give you further details as soon as I hear from you, and we will discuss terms and percentage but you must treat as highly confidential and contact me with my private mail for the security company contact them for the transfer of the funds into your account ( tinanguessan@yahoo.com ).
See the BBC news for more details about this country:http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/4186646.stm
Miss Tina.
Permalink to Comment4. kris on September 8, 2005 7:43 AM writes...
sorry, danah - I tried.
Permalink to Comment5. x on September 8, 2005 9:28 AM writes...
Glocalisation (with a zed). I read it and thought it was a typo, nasty name :(
Permalink to Comment6. Michael Chui on September 17, 2005 2:14 AM writes...
Found Many2Many recently and glanced through the latest. The essay was well-written, and opened my eyes to a lot of things. Trouble is, I'd never heard of either term (Web2.0 or glocalization) before, so I'm not really in a position to comment.
Still, very thought-provoking. It'll find a home in my brain for the next few weeks.
Permalink to Comment7. Michael on September 20, 2005 7:06 AM writes...
I enjoyed reading this link you gave above. Very well written article.
Permalink to Comment8. Stephen on September 21, 2005 6:08 AM writes...
Glocalization hmmm... I liked this subject and enjoyed reading your blog.
Permalink to Comment