Corante

Authors

Clay Shirky
( Archive | Home )

Liz Lawley
( Archive | Home )

Ross Mayfield
( Archive | Home )

Sébastien Paquet
( Archive | Home )

David Weinberger
( Archive | Home )

danah boyd
( Archive | Home )

Guest Authors
Site Search
Monthly Archives
Syndication
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
Don't Miss The DrugSafetyHub, a new blog on counterfeit drugs and the evolution of the pharma industry

Many-to-Many

« Second Life, Games, and Virtual Worlds | Main | about those walled gardens »

February 3, 2007

Technorati's WTF

Email This Entry

Posted by David Weinberger

Technorati has a new feature that’s only slightly confusing but very interesting and potentially quite useful. (Disclosure: I’m on Technorati’s board of advisors.)

It’s called “WTF,” which technically stands for “Where’s the Fire,” but has another more likely meaning. (David Isenberg named one of his conferences “WTF” and then had a contest to decide what it stood for.) So, if you go to Technorati and take a look at the Top Searches in the upper right, to the left of each entry there’s an orange flame. Don’t click on it yet because the page it takes you to is confusing. Instead, click on one of the searches. At the moment, “Boston Mooninites” is the top search. Click on it to go to the search results page. The top result is not a result at all. It’s got a flame icon next to it, indicating that it’s actually the WTF about the phrase “Boston Mooninites.” It’s an explanation of what that phrase means and why people are searching on it now. Who wrote it? Anybody who wants to. So now click on the flame icon. It takes you to the same page you would have gotten to if you had clicked on the flame icon in the Top Searches list on the home page.

Ok, so now you’re on the WTF page for “Boston Mooninites.” Note that this is not the search results page. It’s where you get to create your own WTF for that search query. Or, you can vote on which of the existing ones; the one with the most votes is featured on the search results page for the query.

It’ll be very interesting to see how this develops. For example, the current top WTF for Windows Vista is a product review, not a neutral explanation. (I’m not complaining.) Many of the WTFs on the Vista list are responses to previous ones, as if WTFs are discussion board, probably an artifact of the layout of the WTF page.

Comments (3) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: social software


COMMENTS

1. Judson on February 3, 2007 4:38 PM writes...

I don't know if this will work out. It seems like most people use Technorati for vanity searches. This seems more like a way to tell what's going on, but the site isn't laid out very well for generally seeing what is going on.

You could presumably have a search term you were interested in, and following that feed, but in that case you would already know what is going on with that term presumably. It's an interesting idea, but I can't get how it would be useful.

Permalink to Comment

2. clique on February 4, 2007 11:52 PM writes...

Interesting idea, it just shows how the social media is even transforming search itself.

Permalink to Comment

3. adrian Chan on February 6, 2007 7:25 PM writes...

so it's a contextualized "answers" -- makes sense. short blurbs that create interest in their authors, that are faster than blogs, and that create short-form talk... well done!

Permalink to Comment

TRACKBACKS

TrackBack URL:
http://www.corante.com/cgi-bin/mt/teriore.fcgi/61020.

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Technorati's WTF:

POST A COMMENT




Remember Me?



EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
Spolsky on Blog Comments: Scale matters
"The internet's output is data, but its product is freedom"
Andrew Keen: Rescuing 'Luddite' from the Luddites
knowledge access as a public good
viewing American class divisions through Facebook and MySpace
Gorman, redux: The Siren Song of the Internet
Mis-understanding Fred Wilson's 'Age and Entrepreneurship' argument
The Future Belongs to Those Who Take The Present For Granted: A return to Fred Wilson's "age question"