« Sorry, Wrong Number: McCloud Abandons Micropayments |
Main
| The (Bayesian) Advantage of Youth »
May 8, 2007
social network sites: public, private, or what?
Posted by danah boyd
Over at Knowledge Tree is a recent essay i wrote called Social Network Sites: Public, Private, or What? For many who follow my blog, the arguments are not new, but i suspect some folks might appreciate the consolidated and not-so-spastic version. At the very least, perhaps you’ll be humored to see my writing splattered with the letter ‘s’ instead of the letter ‘z’ (it’s an Australian e-journal). There’s also an MP3 of me reading the essay for those who fear text (which is very novel since y’all know how much i fear audio/video recordings of me, but i did resist trying to sound funny while pronouncing the letter s instead of the letter z). And here’s a PDF of the essay for those who wishing to kill trees.
In conjunction with this essay, there’s a life chat at 2PM Australian Eastern on 22 May. This translates to 9PM PST on 21 May and midnight New York time (which is where i’ll be so hopefully i won’t be too loopy, or at least no more loopy than i am feeling right now).
Enjoy! (Comments at Apophenia)
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: social software
- RELATED ENTRIES
- User-generated neologism: "Indigenous content"
- history of social network sites (a work-in-progress)
- New Freedom Destroys Old Culture: A response to Nick Carr
- responding to critiques of my essay on class
- Tagmashes from LibraryThing
- Spolsky on Blog Comments: Scale matters
- "The internet's output is data, but its product is freedom"
- Andrew Keen: Rescuing 'Luddite' from the Luddites
TrackBack URL:
http://www.corante.com/cgi-bin/mt/teriore.fcgi/61323.